HC extends till Nov 16 stay on trial in Kerala actress attack case

By ANI | Published: November 6, 2020 12:10 PM2020-11-06T12:10:16+5:302020-11-06T12:30:02+5:30

The Kerala High Court on Friday extended till November 16 the stay imposed on the trial in the Kerala actress attack case while considering the applications filed by the prosecution and the victim seeking to transfer the trial to another court.

HC extends till Nov 16 stay on trial in Kerala actress attack case | HC extends till Nov 16 stay on trial in Kerala actress attack case

HC extends till Nov 16 stay on trial in Kerala actress attack case

The Kerala High Court on Friday extended till November 16 the stay imposed on the trial in the Kerala actress attack case while considering the applications filed by the prosecution and the victim seeking to transfer the trial to another court.

A single-judge bench of Justice PV Kunhikrishnan, while hearing the matter today, extended the stay and slated the matter for further hearing on November 16.

Earlier, the Kerala High Court had stayed the trial till November 6 after it was informed by the victim that the trial court allowed objectionable questions on the character of the victim during the hearing in the matter.

"The transfer of trial to another court will not affect the deadline set by the Supreme Court to complete the trial... The trial judge and the prosecutor are now at loggerheads. The judge has made remarks against the prosecutor and has read out the contents of an anonymous letter against the prosecutor," the victim's counsel submitted.

"It is not possible to continue the trial in that court in such a scenario. Since the prosecution itself has expressed doubts about the bona fides of the judge and expressed no-confidence, how can the victim place faith in the court? The victim was put to cross-examination for nine continuous days. The victim of sexual crime had to undergo another ordeal," the counsel added.

The prosecution had, during the last hearing, also submitted that the victim was put to several days of cross-examination before a battery of lawyers of the accused. "Prosection had raised objections. Even objections were not recorded. Unwarranted remarks were made in the court about the conduct of the victim," the prosecutor submitted.

"The Supreme Court judgment allowing access to accused actor Dileep to the memory card did not exclude the prosecution. The SC said that a copy of the FSL report should be given to all concerned. But the trial court did not serve a copy of the report on the prosecution. The entire sequence of events shows that the trial is not being done in a fair manner. In such a backdrop, what is the point in conducting the trial," the prosecution added.

An actor, who has worked in Malayalam, Tamil and Telugu films, was abducted and allegedly molested inside her car by a group of men, who had forced their way into the vehicle on the night of February 17, 2017. She later escaped. Malayalam actor Dileep is an accused in the case.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in app