SC to hear scope of judicial review in Sabarimala temple matter on Feb 3

By ANI | Published: January 30, 2020 05:43 PM2020-01-30T17:43:36+5:302020-01-30T19:00:50+5:30

A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court will hear on February 3 the petition regarding women's entry into Sabarimala temple and frame questions in the matter, Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde said on Thursday.

SC to hear scope of judicial review in Sabarimala temple matter on Feb 3 | SC to hear scope of judicial review in Sabarimala temple matter on Feb 3

SC to hear scope of judicial review in Sabarimala temple matter on Feb 3

A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court will hear on February 3 the petition regarding women's entry into Sabarimala temple and frame questions in the matter, Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde said on Thursday.

CJI Bobde said that the court will examine the matter and hear the scope of judicial review on the point of religious faith and women's rights.

Earlier, the CJI had fixed a 10-day period for concluding the hearing on the petition seeking women's entry into Sabarimala temple, mosques, and Parsi Agiyari.

The Supreme Court had on January 13 said that it will only hear the questions referred to in the review order passed by it in November last year in the Sabarimala temple case, which allowed women and girls of all age groups to visit the shrine in Kerala.

The top court had in November last year, observed that the entry of women into places of worship is not just limited to the Sabarimala temple but also includes issues like allowing Muslim and Parsi women to enter religious practice.

The court is hearing a clutch of petitions seeking reconsideration of its September 2018 judgment that lifted the bar on menstruating women from worshipping in the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.

The apex court in a landmark 4:1 ruling had set aside decades-old restrictions on the entry of women of menstruating age inside the temple.

The verdict had sparked a series of protests across the state, which eventually led to the filing of several petitions seeking review of the top court's order challenging the authority of the court to intervene in a belief of the people.

( With inputs from ANI )

Open in app