Big relief to Shilpa Shetty in 2007 Richard Gere kissing case after Mumbai Court dismiss case

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: April 5, 2023 11:01 AM2023-04-05T11:01:28+5:302023-04-05T11:01:52+5:30

A sessions court here on Monday dismissed a petition filed against a magistrate's order discharging Shilpa Shetty in the ...

Big relief to Shilpa Shetty in 2007 Richard Gere kissing case after Mumbai Court dismiss case | Big relief to Shilpa Shetty in 2007 Richard Gere kissing case after Mumbai Court dismiss case

Big relief to Shilpa Shetty in 2007 Richard Gere kissing case after Mumbai Court dismiss case

A sessions court here on Monday dismissed a petition filed against a magistrate's order discharging Shilpa Shetty in the 2007 obscenity case over Hollywood star Richard Gere kissing her at a public event.The revision application against the magistrate court's order was dismissed by additional sessions judge S C Jadhav. The detailed order, however, was not available as yet.

The kissing incident had taken place during an AIDS awareness programme held in Rajasthan and had hit national headlines, with some segments calling it obscene and an affront to the country's culture. A case was registered in Rajasthan against Gere and Shetty under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Information Technology Act. This case was transferred to Mumbai on the orders of the Supreme Court in 2017. In January 2022, the magistrate's court discharged Shetty after observing that she seemed to be the victim of Gere's act. When this incident had occurred, there were reportedly nationwide protests against the two actors and their effigies were burnt on the streets.

On the allegation that she did not protest when she was kissed, the magistrate's court had said "this by no stretch of the imagination makes her a conspirator or perpetrator of any crime". However, the prosecution filed a revision application before the sessions court claiming the magistrate "erred in discharging the accused" and that the order was "illegal, bad in law and against the principle of natural justice" and deserves to be set aside.

Open in app