Kangana attacks Diljit again, calls the actor ‘local karantikari’ for holidaying in abroad

Looks like, Kangana Ranaut has begun, 2021 on a controversial note as she has been targetting Bollywood celebs on Twitter. The Queen actress, has once again hit out at Diljit Dosanjh, this time taking a dig at his holiday pictures. The actress replied to snaps posted by Diljit as he posed at an undisclosed location. Diljit shared a series of photos posing in a bright orange jacket enjoying the snow and replying to which Kangana Ranaut tagged him as a ‘local revolutionary’.Hitting out at the ‘Soorma’ actor, Kangana wrote, “Wah brother!! Desh mein aag lagake kisanon ko sadak le baitha ke local karantikaris videsh mein thand ka maza le rahe hain, wah!!! Isko kehte hain local kranti... (After instigating the people, making the farmers sit on the streets, local revolutionary is enjoying the chilly winter abroad. This is what I mean when I say ‘local revolutionary’.”

Wah brother!! Desh mein aag lagake kisanon ko sadak le baitha ke local karantikaris videsh mein thand ka maza le rahe hain, wah!!! Isko kehte hain local kranti... 👍 https://t.co/oXepZw633y

— Kangana Ranaut (@KanganaTeam) January 4, 2021

Earlier this month, the Twitter war between Diljit Dosanjh and Kangana Ranaut became a trending topic on the microblogging site. Hashtags #DiljitDestroysKangana and #DiljitVsKangana trended on Twitter.It all began when Diljit slammed Kangana for misidentifying an elderly Sikh woman, who had participated in the farmers' protest, as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh. The Punjabi actor-singer had also shared a video of the elderly lady in question, saying that she was Mahinder Kaur.Kangana had later deleted her post but hit back at Diljit, calling him Bollywood filmmaker Karan Johar's pet.  Recently, Kangana Ranaut took a dig at actress-turned-politician Urmila Matondkar, who purchased a property reportedly worth Rs 3 crore in Mumbai. Responding to Kangana's comments, Urmila posted a video wherein she asked the 'Manikarnika' actress to meet her so that she could show her the papers proving she had bought the property with her own hard-earned money after having worked for nearly 25-30 years in the industry.