Mumbai Court says sex work offence only in public, allows woman to be set free from shelter home

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: May 23, 2023 01:25 PM2023-05-23T13:25:44+5:302023-05-23T13:26:09+5:30

A sessions court here has set aside a magistrate’s order and directed a shelter home to set at liberty ...

Mumbai Court says sex work offence only in public, allows woman to be set free from shelter home | Mumbai Court says sex work offence only in public, allows woman to be set free from shelter home

Mumbai Court says sex work offence only in public, allows woman to be set free from shelter home


A sessions court here has set aside a magistrate’s order and directed a shelter home to set at liberty a 34-year-old woman sex worker detained there, saying as per rule, sex work can be called an offence when one engages in it in a public place causing annoyance to others.

The woman approached the sessions court after the magistrate’s court on March 15 this year directed her to be detained at the shelter home in Mumbai for one year for care, protection and shelter.

Additional sessions judge C V Patil set aside the magistrate court’s order last month. The detailed order was made available recently. The woman was detained in February following a raid at a brothel in suburban Mulund. Thereafter, an FIR was registered against the accused and she, along with two others, was produced before a magistrate court in Mazgaon.

After perusal of the medical report, the magistrate found she was a major and sent her to the Navjeevan Mahila Vastigriha, Deonar, for one year for care, protection and shelter from the date of order.

In her plea before the sessions court, the woman denied indulging in any immoral activities. The sessions court in its order held that the magistrate, only on the ground of antecedent of indulging in similar kind of offence, has detained the victim.

The order is under challenge only on the ground of antecedent that the victim was found indulging earlier also in a similar act, but the victim is major. She has the right to do work, the judge said.

Further, it noted there was no allegation that the woman indulged in sex work in the public. In such circumstances, detaining the victim only on the ground of one antecedent of the similar work is not proper, the sessions judge said.

Open in app